Archive for May, 2009

Watch out: Locational element added to LD 1333

Monday, May 18th, 2009

As you know from our previous post, all unsavory pieces of L.D. 1268 were eliminated by the Committee, a major victory that is attributed to the hard work of all of you who spoke out against this potentially paralyzing piece of legislation.

However, in response, DEP has worked to insert language into an amendment to LD 1333, An Act to Establish Climate and Energy Planning in Maine that would give that agency sweeping authority related to the site law that they’d previously hoped to gain through LD 1268. This would be a back door approach to potentially add the “locational element” that we at Main-Land Development Consultants so vigorously opposed with L.D. 1268.

We clearly believe LD 1333 should be defeated as a result, and will do everything in our power to ensure that happens. In the meantime, we encourage you to please contact your legislators (House and Senate Members) to let them know of your opposition to L.D. 1333 and thank them for their support of LD 1268.

LD 1268 moves to Maine House with ALL objectional portions pulled

Monday, May 18th, 2009

Great news!!! After months of hard work to fight LD 1268: An Act to Update the Site Location of Development Laws, we here at Main-Land Development Consultants can happily report that the Joint Standing Committee on Natural Resources has moved forward with a bill that ensures rural Maine will remain open to responsible development.

Following dozens of very thoughtful and persuasive testimonies at the LD 1268 public hearing in mid-April, the Natural Resources Committee held two work sessions on the bill- one on April 28 and the other on May 8. Main-Land Development Consultants owner Darryl Brown, who has led the challenge to this bill from the beginning, was invited by the committee to participate in both sessions, and was there last Friday when the committee voted unanimously to pass a completely modified version of LD 1268 which had every single aspect of the bill that we at Main-Land and other opponents from around the state found disagreeable removed

Specifically, the following provisions were eliminated from the legislation.

-Everything relating to the location elements – this is in reference to the piece that would have restricted DEP approved projects to only those areas where towns had identified designated growth areas;
-the definition of “significant groundwater aquifer” and changed the groundwater standard. Basically, the existing language in the law stays as is;
-the exceptions for a lot of 40 acres or more in the definition of “subdivision.” Again, the 40 acre exception remains as is;
-the low-density subdivision exemption. We are still able to create a “low density subdivision” without triggering the Site Law;
-and,all of the additional bonding requirements that the legislation tried to do.

Also, the new legislation
-changed the exception for a sale or lease of a lot to an abutter in the definition of “subdivision”. Existing language in the law remains unchanged in relation to transfers to abutters;
-and changed the exception for a common lot created with a conservation easement in the definition of “subdivision.”

The new bill, which actually contains some potentially positive provisions for the development community (issues relating to long-term construction, providing broader permitting authority to MDOT projects and providing municipalities a method to substitute local stormwater permits for state permits) now moves to the House and then to the Senate, where it is expected to be passed in both places without discussion.

In the meantime, please know how grateful all of us at Main-Land Development Consultants are for your continued contributions, support and encouragement throughout this process. Whether you attended one of our seven forums around Western Maine, or bravely told the committee how LD 1268 would hurt your community, you were an invaluable part of the process that helped protect rural Maine and its future. Thank you

Delicious Architecture Gets Second Chance

Sunday, May 17th, 2009

The Norway Historical Society and citizens of the Town of Norway did not know if the Evans-Cummings House, also known as the Gingerbread House, would be able to continue to call the Town of Norway home. However, what started as an improbable idea has been developed into a plan of action. The groups have formed a task force dedicated to moving the house to a nearby parcel where it can continue to be cared for and enjoyed. Barry Allen has offered his services on behalf of Main-Land as a gesture of support to the community. Barry performed a boundary survey of the parcel  to which the historic building is slated to be moved in order to verify the fit. Other members of the community are donating time and materials to rehab items such as the antique windows.

The Gingerbread House was constructed with its unique tower in 1850 by Richard Evans and altered in the late 1880s . With its collage of victorian styles, the house is on the National Register of Historic Places. The Norway Historical Society hopes that it can remain on the Register after the move.


Home | About Us | Our Family | Planning | Surveying | Environmental Mapping | Soils Evaluation/Mapping | Engineering | Municipal Services | Environmental Site Assessment | Projects | Latest News | Forms | Client Area

The Latest News for Main-Land Development Consultants is proudly powered by WordPress